Posted on

Creative writing groups

The 4 Hidden Dangers of Writing Groups

Note from Jane: Last week, I ran a comprehensive guest post on how to find the right critique group. To help add to the nuance and complexity of that issue, I’m happy to feature the following guest post by Jennie Nash (@jennienash), the Chief Creative Officer of Author Accelerator .

Writers love the idea of writing groups. Writing is, after all, a very lonely pursuit. You sit alone in a room wrestling your ideas onto the page, struggling to fend off the constant attacks of doubt. Your regular friends probably don’t quite get what you are doing and can’t help. So it makes perfect sense to join other writers who can help you navigate the joys and sorrows of the creative process.

Unfortunately, the reality of writing groups is far more complicated than that. Underneath the good intentions there are serious dangers lurking.

In my work as a book coach I often see the damage that writing groups do, and it is not benign. Writing groups can cause fatal frustration, deep self-doubt, and sometimes years of wasted effort. In this post I’m going to outline the most common dangers of writing groups, and will also propose some ways you could improve your group to give you more of what you need—and less of what you don’t.

To illustrate my points, I’m turning to wisdom shared in Creativity, Inc by Ed Catmull, President of Pixar and Disney Animation. In this book, Catmull shows the many ways that the powerhouse studio has managed creativity, and in the process produced some of the most resonant and beloved stories of our time. He talks about the concept of management on a really big scale—department hierarchies and multi-million dollar movie projects—but the fact of the matter is that we all must manage our own creativity if we are going to do any good work, and his wisdom applies to all of us.

1. No one tells the truth and no one really wants to hear it.

Most writing groups tiptoe around glaring weaknesses in the work being shared and sometimes tell outright lies about it, because they don’t want to hurt people’s feelings. All the writer hears is praise or vague criticism that isn’t very actionable, and so they assume that what they are writing is solid (if not awesome) and they plow on creating fundamentally flawed work.

Praise is wonderful—it feels good to hear it—but it is not very helpful for the writer committed to writing a book that engages the reader. Writers must find a way to welcome criticism, even harsh criticism, but writer’s groups tend not to foster this skill, and as a result, no one grows, no one learns, and people become deluded about their work—believing it to be better than it is.

At Pixar, truth-telling is a central part of the creative process. As Catmull writes:

In the very early days of Pixar, John, Andrew, Pete, Lee, and Joe made a promise to one another. No matter what happened, they would always tell each other the truth. They did this because they recognized how important and rare candid feedback is and how, without it, our films would suffer. Then and now, the term we use to describe this kind of constructive criticism is “good notes.”

Before we get to the good notes part, let’s look at the promise to tell the truth. That’s the critical thing a good writers group needs—not an implicit promise, but an actual commitment. Every single member of your group needs to understand the promise about telling the truth, believe in it, commit to it, and welcome it when it is their turn in the hot seat. This starts with a shift in mindset, which Catmull describes beautifully:

Naturally, every director would prefer to be told that his film is a masterpiece. But, because of the way [our group] is structured, the pain of being told that flaws are apparent or revisions are needed is minimized. Rarely does a director get defensive, because no one is pulling rank or telling the filmmaker what to do. The film itself—not the filmmaker—is under the microscope. This principle eludes most people, but it is crucial: You are not your idea, and if you identify too closely with your idea, you will take offense when they are challenged. To set up a healthy feedback system, you must remove power dynamics from the equation—you must enable yourself, in other words, to focus on the problem, not the person.

Try the following fixes for your writing group:

  • Every writer in your group needs to agree to speak the truth and to accept the truth. It helps enormously if the writers in the group have a similar level of expertise and experience, and if they share the same clearly stated goals. Someone writing a book because it’s cathartic and fun is in a very different place from someone writing a book for publication, and it could be that you need to shake up the composition of the group in order to be able to make a commitment to the truth. Making these changes can be heartbreaking—but that’s part of truth telling, too.
  • Each member needs to speak with deep kindness and a sense of hope when it’s their turn to offer a critique. Mean-spirited attacks that leave you gasping for breath and feeling small are among the most damaging realities of all. There is a difference between telling the truth and being mean. Don’t allow mean.
  • Each member needs to take a deep breath and welcome the truth when it’s their turn to hear it. Remember that when someone is criticizing your work, they are not criticizing you.
  • Finally, the group needs to make a commitment to understanding what giving good notes is all about. Which brings us to No. 2 below.

2. Struggling writers are not often the best judges of struggling writing.

At Pixar, giving good notes happens in a meeting of what’s known as the Braintrust. “The Braintrust,” Catmull writes, “is made up of people with a deep understanding of storytelling and, usually, people who have been through the process themselves.” This is a critical concept that most writing groups don’t adhere to, because they can’t adhere to it. They’re often comprised of writers who are struggling to find their way for the first time, and it’s one of the main dangers of being in a writing group.

There is not one single thing wrong with struggle. Struggle is part of the creative process for everyone at every level, but why would you think that being in a room with other people who are also struggling with the same things you are, and who have no experience with that struggle, would be a good way to nurture your work? Yes, you might get camaraderie and community, which is nice, but by design, the odds of getting specific, focused, useful help with your story are low. Why is that? As Catmull writes:

While problems in a film are fairly easy to identify, the sources of those problems are often extraordinarily difficult to assess. … Think of it like a patient complaining of a knee pain that stems from his fallen arches. If you operate on the knee, it wouldn’t just fail to alleviate the pain, it could compound it. To alleviate the pain, you have to find and deal with the root of the problem.

A group of writers who are not trained to assess problems with a story or argument often get it wrong, or get it partially right, or demand specific remedies—not necessarily on purpose, but by a sort of unconscious group-think approach of what they like or don’t like. It’s not good. It comes without any assistance in how to move forward. You get the “it’s not working” feedback, but not the nurturing and patience you need to fix your problem, and certainly not the editorial understanding you need to prevent it from happening again. People may offer ideas for how they would fix things, or how they see your story or what they would do, but this is a sure path for crushing fragile new projects and wavering confidence.

So what exactly IS a good note? Here is the principle as Catmull describes it on his website:

Truly candid feedback is the only way to ensure excellence. When giving notes, be sure to include:

What is Wrong

What is Missing

What Isn’t Clear

What Doesn’t Make Sense

A good note is specific. A good note does not make demands. Most of all, a good note inspires.

Copy that principle down and laminate it so you can look at it during your writing group critiques. It is so smart. It’s not about praise of any kind whatsoever (although Catmull does say that most Braintrust meetings start with the members praising the director.) And it is not about ways the writer should fix the problem. It’s about identifying weakness in a very specific way, articulating them, and helping the writer to see them, and to sort out how to go about fixing them.

Try the following fixes for your writing group:

  • Use Catmull’s criteria for giving good notes—and I mean literally. Make each note follow his format, and don’t allow any other commentary. That means never saying, “Ohh, what if your character is from another planet instead?” or “I think you should start at Chapter 5,” or “You’re the best writer, I’m so jealous, I wish I could write like you.”
  • Hone your story analysis skills by learning the craft of self-editing—I highly recommend The Artful Edit by Susan Bell (principles of editing), Handling the Truth by Beth Kephart (the critical importance of truth in memoir) and Wired for Story by Lisa Cron (how to write fiction designed to give the reader what the brain craves.) Read these books in your writing group and discuss them and evaluate your own work according to their principles. This will be a powerful learning tool. You may also like my guide, How to Edit A Complete Manuscript . It teaches you how to put down your writer’s hat and put on an editing hat.

3. Struggling writers are not often the best judges of struggling writing, Part 2.

This point is so important that I’m making it again, in a different way.

Let’s assume that neither you nor your writing group members can hone their story analysis skills overnight. This is, in fact, often the reality. Many writers think they understand story and narrative because they love to read, and they are great readers, and they recognize a great story when it’s on the page. But that is very different from knowing how a dramatic narrative (for fiction) or a narrative argument (for non fiction) is constructed, or knowing how to get the emotion on the page, or knowing how to hold the readers’ expectation in your mind as you write. These are very different skills. Some writers are native geniuses at it, but those people are very rare. Most writers are honing their story analysis and narrative design skills in terms of their own writing, not in terms of being able to articulate it to other writers.

So how can you help each other with your work? If the people in your group don’t have the knowledge and expertise to diagnose problems, don’t do it. Seriously. Don’t. Consider skipping the editorial analysis completely and make the group be about accountability, camaraderie, support, and information-sharing instead of about the words on the page.

Try the following fixes for your writing group:

  • Give each writer time to talk about the weaknesses they see in their work and the solutions they are contemplating. Let them try to sort those things out in a supportive space. Often, simply having to articulate your problem goes a long way towards solving it. I find that writers frequently know what’s wrong with their own work if you give them the time and space to confront those truths, and this is far better than asking people who are not trained to weigh in on what’s wrong with the work.
  • Give everyone half an hour to talk about the problems they are having making time to write—or the doubt they are feeling about the point of their story, or their lack of faith in their worthiness as a writer. These are experiences every human is indeed an expert on (managing time, facing doubt, being brave) and experiences that can be fundamental to writing success.
  • Assign members research projects. Spend time sharing what you have read about changes in the industry, trends in pricing, what readers are doing and saying and thinking, and how writers are reaching readers. Look at newsletters such as The Hot Sheet about the business of writing, or at Shelf Awareness , about the business of bookselling. Identify useful writing blogs ( Save the Cat , Shawn Coyne ) and push yourself to include sites that focus on social media and entrepreneurial skills ( Alexis Grant , Joanna Penn, and Dan Blank ). All of this is just as important to being a successful writer than the words on the page. I do not believe that excellent writing can come from writers whose only goal is to sell, but I also believe that writers who ignore the realities of how books are bought and sold, and ignore the demands of their readers and their competitors, are writing with their heads in the sand. Publishing success is often deemed to be mostly a matter of luck and timing—and while luck and timing certainly play a role, knowledge about the demands of readers and the realities of publishing is almost always a factor, as well.
  • Save up your pennies to find an actual expert to help you with the words on the page. This could be an online group workshop from somewhere like Gotham Writers Workshop , UCLA Extension Writer’s Program or Writer’s Digest ; a class at a nearby college; or hiring an editor or book coach. (Jane has a fabulous list of resources on her site here .)

4. Failure is not an option in a writer’s group, but failure is a part of the writing process.

Writing is a creative undertaking, and all creative undertakings are messy. Things sometimes get worse before they get better. Things can take a long time to come into focus, as you ping back and forth between what you thought you were doing and what you are actually doing, between the start of the story and the finish, between one narrative thread and another. Failure is part of the territory—a big part of it. Writing groups, however, tend to exclusively celebrate forward progress, and clean, linear thinking.

This happens because writing groups focus on only on one tiny slice of work at a time. If that slice happens to be logical, chronological, clear and well written, you get a thumbs up. Problems related to how that slice fits into the whole sweep of the story, or how it supports the premise, or how it aligns with the overall structure are largely ignored—and yet many of the most common problems I see are the result of flaws in these areas. When seen through a micro lens, a chapter can be beautiful and moving and polished yet be an utter failure at doing what it needs to do on a macro level—which is to drive the story or the argument forward towards a clear and resonant resolution.

Some of the best passages in Catmull’s book chronicle the early, messy stages of beloved stories like Toy Story . Can you imagine Woody ever being a character who was fuzzy and unformed? He was, and as you can imagine, that impacted every element of the story. The writers and producers wrestled with his character for a long time before hitting on the slightly neurotic little toy cowboy who adores his owner Andy and is nervous about the newcomer, Buzz. Catmull’s point in letting us inside Woody’s transformation is to show us that the creative process is never linear and straightforward, and that you must make room for failure:

Pixar films are not good at first, and our job is to make them so—to go, as I say, “from suck to not-suck.” This idea—that all movies we now think of as brilliant were, at one time, terrible—is a hard concept for many to grasp. … Creativity has to start somewhere, and we are true believers in the power of bracing, candid feedback and the iterative process—reworking, reworking, and reworking again, until a flawed story finds its throughline or a hollow character finds its soul.

Try the following fixes for your writing group—which are all reiterations of the points we’ve outlined, above.

  • Tell the truth. If someone is not working—if it has a fatal flaw, if it’s ill conceived, if it has an underlying problem of logic—say so, in as specific way as possible. Don’t hold back for the sake of being nice. Nice is saving a writer from years of writing in the wrong direction.
  • Be open to criticism. If you get deep criticism on something you have written, consider that you might need to scratch it, start again, go back to Go. Allow that reality a place at the table. Many writers say that they know something is working when they start throwing out a lot of pages. They can see their vision clearly—and they can see what doesn’t fit.
  • Give good notes—and ask for them. Encourage the members of your group to ask for the help they think they need. Rather than reading a passage of text and waiting for generic feedback, urge the writer to say, “I’m having trouble with the passage where I explain my system for writing a resume. I’d like you guys to listen to see what I am missing.” This is, in effect, asking for a “good note.”
  • Talk about the failure. Talk about the doubt and the agony of it all. Let the pain be part of the mix, because creating something out of nothing is not easy. It’s highly emotional work, no matter what the genre. Writers need support—real support, not just surface level support—and they need a place where they can fail. Let your writing group be that place, and you will be providing an invaluable service.

Jennie Nash is an author and book coach, and the Chief Creative Officer of Author Accelerator. Sign up for her weekly coaching lessons at JennieNash.com.

In Austin, indie creative writing communities thrive beyond the ivory tower

In a small studio in central East Austin, lamplit, with night outside the windows, four writers work intently in their notebooks. Not far away, poets and musicians share the limelight onstage while a packed house audibly encourages them along. Further south, in a former horse barn tucked away on seven woodsy acres, a newly published author clinks glasses and signs her name beside a host of others on the wall.

Though some of these scenes predate the pandemic, and others await the right time for a safe return, all depict the vibrant landscape for creative writers that a number of independent organizations have cultivated outside Austin’s big institutions. In offering classes, readings, performances, and more informal opportunities for connection, these organizations employ the working artists that are their founders, staff, and teachers, and offer inclusive spaces where both fledgling and experienced writers can find community and grow in their craft.

Given its history as a haven for intellectuals and artists from Texas and beyond, it’s no surprise that Austin has long nurtured a strong community of writers. In 1981, what would become the Writers’ League of Texas formed as a small group based in Austin, seeking connection and support. Now the largest literary arts organization in Texas, the WLT is still going strong. The University of Texas, St. Edward’s University, and Texas State also run significant academic creative writing programs, including nationally acclaimed Master of Fine Arts programs that many see as gateways to professional success for aspiring writers. However, there’s more demand for support for writers, or a more diverse set of needs, than these programs can serve on their own.

Austinites from a variety of backgrounds seek instruction and connection as writers through the smaller organizations. Jaime deBlanc-Knowles, a fiction writer who began teaching workshops and coaching writers through her small business, Fresh Ink Austin, in 2017, describes how many of her students work outside of professions related to writing.

“A lot of my students are… engineers and insurance agents, they work for Google,” she says. ”There are so many people out there just wanting to be creative.”

Finding an on-ramp for that desire to write, though, can pose a challenge, especially for adults with busy lives and responsibilities; programs that require application processes, substantial tuition, or a big time commitment discourage many would-be writers. d

“To have someplace where you can go and be creative and it’s not intimidating, that’s kind of a big deal,” says deBlanc-Knowles. “It’s really important for students to have a welcoming environment to reconnect with that youthful part of themselves that was excited to create.”

At the Writing Barn in South Austin, where nationally celebrated kidlit writer Bethany Hegedus began offering classes and retreats in 2013, writers find a supportive community with particular strength in programming related to the process of completing publishable work and expanding access to the publishing industry. When Hegedus moved to Austin and initially worked for the Writers’ League, she noticed a niche that needed filling.

“For intermediate writers, or a writer who was on the verge, there weren’t a lot of places that met those needs,” she says.

Classes and events at the Writing Barn seek to provide transparency about both “the business and the craft side” of becoming a professional writer, as Jessica Hincapie, a poet who started as an intern at the Writing Barn and now serves as its Program Director, says. Hincapie remembers that when she first got to know Hegedus and heard about her friendships with other published writers, the possibility of becoming a professional writer herself began to feel real.

“It was a peek behind the curtain,” Hincapie says. “This isn’t this goal that is so lofty and unattainable that the average person who just stumbles into writing and loves storytelling can’t manage it; anyone can do this thing.”

One of Austin’s newest independent groups that supports writers, as well as artists working in other disciplines, is Interfaces, which began in 2019 as an open mic and reading series but has quickly grown into a non-profit that offers educational events and performances as well as a residency. In Interfaces’ mission statement, the group identifies itself as a “community initiative that works to nurture and amplify marginalized artists in the Austin, Texas area through IDEA-conscious arts programming.”

Interfaces’ founder, the poet KB, notes that the initiative began in part as a response to “a serious problem with accessibility” of all kinds, including physical and financial, in the literary and arts events they attended in Austin. Inclusivity extends to what KB calls the “intermingling” of different artistic disciplines, as a corrective to the fragmentation KB and others witnessed, where poets, for instance, seemed to inhabit different spaces even from fiction writers, never mind from musicians, filmmakers and other kinds of artists.

This fragmentation also characterizes the social divisions among Austin’s artists, along lines of class, ethnicity, ability, sexuality, gender identity, and on and on. In trying to imagine a different approach, KB says, Interfaces uses IDEA — Inclusivity, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility — “as consciousness creating arts spaces that intentionally champion, and practice, designing events for everyone (and) making our spaces for as many people as possible is a thing that we’re trying to do.”

All of Austin’s independent creative writing organizations have done more work on issues of equity and access recently. Since financial accessibility always increases equity, the question of how to fund programs comes up. Grants have helped Interfaces to fulfill its goal of providing free events in accessible spaces.

“Especially during the pandemic when a lot of my students lost their jobs, I started offering scholarship seats, which I think is really important,” says Fresh Ink’s deBlanc-Knowles. “I’ve been applying for grants to offer more.”

Austin Bat Cave, founded in 2007 and another stalwart in the indie creative writing landscape, brings a huge slate of free creative writing classes to young people in underserved communities through school and community partnerships. ABC does offer classes for adults, but they are fee-based, which helps to fund its free programming for kids; adults may also apply for financial assistance with tuition. Likewise, the Writing Barn offers scholarships and has increased free programming, particularly online, during the pandemic. In Hegedus’ thinking, online programming also increases equity because of the barriers to attending in-person events when physical disabilities, caretaking, and various kinds of neurodiversity come into play.

In addition to nurturing aspiring writers, Austin’s indie writing organizations give working writers a way to support themselves through paid positions as teachers and program staff. It was often in trying to find spaces and means to do their own work that the founders began their groups. “I couldn’t find my creative community after grad school, so I just made one (with Fresh Ink),” says deBlanc-Knowles.

Though Hegedus did most of the work of the Writing Barn on her own in early years, the expansion of programming has made space for other writers to work as paid staff, as well as numerous “teaching artists” who conduct workshops ranging from single-session classes to six-month intensives focused on particular genres. In the past year, Interfaces has had the resources to pay performers and staff, though KB notes that “we’re not in a place where anyone is full time or gets benefits; it’s our passion project.”

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic caused an initial disruption for all the organizations; many reported feeling “scared” about the viability of their programs, like “anyone whose business involved bringing people together,” as deBlanc-Knowles said. Attendance at classes and events had been strong; Hegedus and Hincapie had just attended their first Associated Writing Programs (AWP) conference to promote The Writing Barn, and deBlanc-Knowles reminisced about a thriving series of in-person events, like drop-in events at coffeeshops — all of which had to be suddenly canceled.

At Interfaces, KB describes how “pre-pandemic, we were getting ready to move to a new venue, a bigger venue; we were getting ready to do a lot of really cool access measures that I hadn’t seen at in-person events before; we had to shut all of that down and figure out how we wanted to emerge in the virtual realm.”

Some things just didn’t translate to a Zoom format. Writing classes, however, did translate, more seamlessly than one might have thought. As Hegedus commented, “the only way we could source community was online.” The Writing Barn had already been running a significant part of its programming online to reach an audience beyond Austin, and all the organizations observed how the virtual shift expanded access for people in a variety of locations and with a variety of needs. deBlanc-Knowles reflected on how aspiring writers made use of more free time in the last year to work on their craft; demand for her classes actually increased during the pandemic. Past the initial shock, the pandemic year provided more time for Interfaces to work on grant writing and revisiting the mission and identity of the group.

The independent organizations that serve Austin’s writers share an underlying belief in the importance of every person’s story, every person’s voice. “It’s an identity thing,” deBlanc-Knowles observes about the choice to share one’s writing.

In agreeing to admit an audience, however small, to their work, people who’d like to write can actually begin to think of themselves as writers. And those who come to classes and events in Austin have a variety of end points in mind for their work.

Says the Writing Barn’s Hincapie: “Success looks different for a lot of different writers.”